An AI Benchmark That Tests Real Coding Workflows
Developers face a real choice: pick a coding model or agent based on synthetic benchmarks that look great but do not predict actual project work. The problem is no longer whether models can score well
Series
Ship-Bench: Benchmarks
Ship-Bench tests if AI agents and coding tools can actually ship realistic software. It evaluates LLMs across a full agentic SDLC workflow: planning, architecture, UX/design, implementation, and QA.
Posts in this series
Can Gemma 4 Beat Gemini 3.1 Pro at Coding?
Is a $20/month Google AI Pro account worth it versus running Gemma 4 31B on OpenRouter pay-as-you-go? This Ship-Bench run was designed to answer that question across a realistic coding workflow rather
Do Open Frontier Models Have A Chance Against Closed Models ?
Which of the new open-ish frontier models has the best chance to stand up against closed-source models on both cost and quality? I ran Ship-Bench against Kimi K2.6, Qwen 3.6 Plus, and DeepSeek v4 Pro
Can the Mid-Tier Models Stack Up Against the Bigger Siblings?
Can you really justify paying flagship prices when the mid-tier models may already be good enough? The original comparison started with Gemini 3 Flash vs. Claude Sonnet 4.6, then Gemini 3.5 Flash arri
Can Fable 5 Finish Off the Other Frontiers?
Can Anthropic's Fable 5 justify its staggering cost and live up to the massive hype to unseat the top specialized models? I ran Ship-Bench against the model to find out, stacking it up directly agains
Does Grok 4.5 Deliver Opus Results at a Fraction of the Price?
Can Grok 4.5 deliver an Opus-class agentic coding result without the premium frontier price tag? I ran Ship-Bench against Grok 4.5 using Grok Build to find out, looking at whether xAI’s latest model c
